I don't know if you've had a chance to watch the latest 4-Sided Dive, but it was a little startling to me to hear Taliesin's takeaway on the situation in Hearthdell, which didn't jibe with my memories of what was actually said about the actions of the Dawnfather's followers there. I think it's really realistic in terms of people (all people, not excluding myself here) tending to form an opinion based on the first story they hear, when there may be more to the story, more nuance, more grayscale, or a whole other side. Unfortunately the party acted without hearing the other side, but in their defense it felt like Matt was kind of pushing them in that direction, and after the fact has done very little to suggest they read the situation wrong.
Matt also said in the same 4-Sided Dive, "Each campaign has multiple different themes, but this one definitely is faith and what that means in a very relative sense. Faith can be so many things and it can mean so many different things to different people. I like exploring gods and religion, both in the positive and the not so positive light, as just like in our real world, there's plenty of both, and I think based on the themes of Ludinus, the Ruby Vanguard, the pantheon, what we built over these years in Exandria, I think it's a wonderful place to explore what often in fantasy settings is just a given. There are gods, and they exist, and they're powerful, and they're mysterious, and then you focus on the small world. This campaign, I'm definitely interested in going, but what if small world could destroy the gods? And how would they react to that, and how would the world react to that sort of turmoil of conflicting philosophies and drives and interests?"